AI AUTOMATION SYSTEM / CASE STUDY
WORKFLOW / OPERATIONAL DEMO

AI Lead Qualification
& Routing System

An n8n workflow that validates incoming leads, uses Gemini to qualify them, stores structured data in Supabase, and routes leads for human follow-up.

Stack n8n · Gemini · Supabase · Gmail
PIPELINE ARCHITECTURE
01
LEAD Incoming webhook payload
02
VALIDATE Syntax, domain & completeness check
03
QUALIFY Gemini structured evaluation & scoring
04
STORE Persist structured record in Supabase
05
ROUTE Contextual dispatch via Gmail notification
THE PROBLEM

Lead handling gets harder
as volume grows.

A lead comes in.

Someone has to check whether the information is complete, understand what the person actually needs, decide how relevant the lead is, record it somewhere, and determine whether someone should follow up.

When those decisions stay manual, consistency becomes harder to maintain.

THE MANUAL DECISION CHAIN
01 New lead
02 Information check
03 Understand intent
04 Record data
05 Decide priority
06 Follow up

The problem is not one individual task — it is the number of connected decisions around a lead.

The workflow was designed to connect these steps into one predictable process.

SYSTEM OVERVIEW

From incoming lead
to human decision.

The workflow separates deterministic checks from AI-based interpretation, then persists the result before deciding what happens next.

PIPELINE EXECUTION FLOW DETERMINISTIC → AI → ROUTED
TRIGGER
Receive Lead Webhook payload ingestion
TRANSFORM
Normalize Lead Sanitize, trim & standard format
LOGIC
Validate Lead Input Required fields & format check
Valid Lead?
YES — VALID
AI EVALUATION
Qualify Lead with Gemini Evaluate intent & enforce JSON schema
DATABASE
Store Qualified Lead Persist structured row in Supabase
Human Review Required?
YES ACTION
Notify Sales Contextual Gmail dispatch for review
NO ARCHIVE
Low Priority Logged without alert interruption
NO — INVALID
FILTER
Handle Invalid Lead Capture validation failure reasons
DATABASE
Store Rejected Lead Persist to error/rejection log

Deterministic validation happens before AI processing. Structured AI output is then used for storage and routing.

INTERACTIVE DEMO

Send a lead through the system.

Submit a sample lead and see how the workflow evaluates and routes it.

Demo submissions are processed through the workflow and used only to demonstrate the system.

HOW THE SYSTEM WORKS

Each step has a specific job.

01

VALIDATE

Required fields are checked before AI processing.

02

QUALIFY

Gemini evaluates relevance, intent, service need and follow-up requirement.

03

STRUCTURE

Structured Output Parser enforces predictable JSON for downstream logic.

04

STORE

The resulting lead data is persisted in Supabase.

05

ROUTE

The qualification result determines whether the lead requires human review or follows a lower-priority path.

WHY THIS SPLIT

Use deterministic logic where the problem is deterministic.
Use AI where interpretation is required.

Validation is deterministic, so it happens with normal workflow logic.

Lead qualification involves interpreting intent and context, so Gemini is used there.

Because downstream systems need predictable data, the AI response is constrained to a defined structure before it is stored or used for routing.

01 Validate before AI
02 Structure before downstream actions
03 Store before route
IMPLEMENTATION

Built as an executable n8n workflow.

The system was implemented as a single workflow with explicit validation, AI qualification, persistence and routing paths.

n8n WORKFLOW CANVAS · RUNTIME PIPELINE
n8n Lead Qualification & Routing Workflow
Stack n8n · Google Gemini · Supabase · Gmail · Webhook

The workflow uses deterministic logic for validation and routing, with Gemini introduced only where interpretation is required.

CASE STUDY

From lead submission to routing decision.

PROBLEM

Manual lead handling can require several connected decisions: checking input, understanding intent, recording information and deciding whether someone should follow up.

APPROACH

Separate deterministic processing from AI interpretation, then persist the structured result before routing.

TESTING The workflow was tested against different lead conditions:
High-intent lead Human review triggered
Medium / ambiguous lead Qualification + review
Low-quality lead Low-priority path
Invalid submission Rejected before AI processing
CURRENT LIMITATION

Qualification criteria are intentionally generic for this demonstration. A production implementation would require domain-specific criteria, evaluation data and monitoring.

Possible extensions: CRM integration · domain-specific scoring · evaluation/monitoring · additional routing channels